Los Angeles Times:
"Exclusive Buyer's Agents work only for consumers and
often can save them money -- and they don't cost more to hire...
Exclusive Buyer's Agents are not tied to any particular property or
agency, so they will show buyers any home, even those for sale by
owner."
Consumer Federation of America:
"We urge consumers who are purchasing a home to first
consider an Exclusive Buyer Broker relationship."
Woman's World:
"Exclusive
Buyer Agents are
legally obligated to get the best deal for home buyers."
The
New York Times:
"Buyer
Brokers make a great deal of
sense."
Business Week:
"To protect
themselves, buyers can retain their own exclusive representative."
Ralph
Nadar -- Agency Law Quarterly:
"Nadar again holds up
exclusive buyer brokerage as the only legitimate option for the home
buying public."
The Idaho Statesman:
"You
can't represent the best interest of the buyer or the seller if you
are wearing two hats."
Money Magazine:
"You
save big bucks by hiring a buyer broker."
Chicago Sun
Times:
"Unless the agent is an
Exclusive Buyer's Agent... there is a potential conflict of interest."
The
San Francisco Examiner:
"Exclusive
Buyer Agents make
every effort to get the lowest possible price for their buyers."
Fairfield
County Business Journal:
"Exclusive buyer
representatives act exclusively on behalf of the buyer... loyalty to
the buyer is never in question."
Smart Money:
"Groups
such as the Consumer Federation and the American Association of
Retired Persons recommended using buyer's agents... the reason is they
work."
Senior Life Style:
"How can one
agent represent the best interest of two opposing sides?"
Consumer
Reports:
"You can't have partial loyalty, an agent
either works for you or works for someone else."
I
Rest My Case!
"ALWAYS Working For
the Buyer"
It's a Changing World
Out There 
